Assessment service
Backup & Disaster Recovery Review
An independent recoverability review that helps leadership understand whether backup and disaster recovery expectations match reality.
When “We Have Backups” Is Not Enough
Most organizations believe they have backups. Fewer can clearly answer what would happen if a server failed, a cloud account was compromised, ransomware encrypted critical systems, or a building became unavailable.
That gap is uncomfortable for leadership. You may not need to know every technical detail of the backup platform, but you do need to know whether the business can recover in a way that matches operational expectations.
A Backup & Disaster Recovery Review is for organizations that want to move from assumption to evidence.
The Real Question Is Recoverability
Backups are only one part of resilience. The more important question is whether the organization can restore the right systems, in the right order, within a timeframe the business can survive.
Small and mid-sized organizations often have dedicated IT staff who work hard to protect the environment. But they may not have the time, independence, or executive mandate to step back and test the full recovery picture.
Coverage may be incomplete. Recovery objectives may be unclear. Restore tests may be too limited. Backup credentials may create risk. Critical dependencies may not be documented. Cloud systems may be assumed to be protected when they are not.
None of this means the team has failed. It means recoverability needs deliberate review.
What MP Technology Group Does
MP Technology Group evaluates backup and disaster recovery from a business-continuity and risk perspective.
We review backup architecture, system coverage, recovery objectives, restore testing practices, disaster recovery procedures, immutability or backup protection, offsite recovery strategy, documentation, ownership, and dependency mapping.
The work is designed to answer practical leadership questions: What can we recover? How long would it take? What would still be missing? What assumptions are we making? What should we fix first?
What You Should Expect To Learn
You should come away knowing whether recovery expectations are realistic.
If the business expects a system back in hours but the current design makes that unlikely, leadership should know before a crisis. If backups exist but have not been meaningfully tested, that should be visible. If ransomware could affect backup integrity, that should be addressed. If critical systems are protected differently than leadership assumes, that should be clear.
The outcome is not fear. The outcome is preparedness.
What The Engagement Produces
The engagement produces a recovery readiness assessment, backup and disaster recovery findings, risk analysis, testing and validation recommendations, and a recovery improvement roadmap.
The roadmap helps leadership decide which resilience improvements matter most and gives technical teams clearer direction for strengthening recoverability.
What This Is Not
This is not ongoing backup administration or a managed disaster recovery service.
MP Technology Group provides independent evaluation and practical recommendations so your organization can improve recoverability before it is tested by a real event.